SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CONSORT Item Reporting Quality in the Top Ten Ranked Journals of Critical Care Medicine in 2011: A Retrospective Analysis
16 references·9 citing·22 second hop
CONSORT Item Reporting Quality in the Top Ten Ranked Journals of Critical Care Medicine in 2011: A Retrospective Analysis (2015)CONSORT Item Reporting Quality in the Top…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasConsolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS) (2024)Consolidated Reporting Guidel…Methodology reporting improved over time in 176,469 randomized controlled trials (2023)Methodology reporting improve…Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility (2022)Quality Output Checklist and …Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement (2021)Evaluation of reporting quali…A Review of Adherence and Predictors of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials (2020)A Review of Adherence and Pre…Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study (2019)Reporting sample size calcula…Assessment of the reporting quality of RCTs for novel oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease based on the CONSORT statement (2019)Assessment of the reporting q…Reporting trends of randomised controlled trials in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review (2016)Reporting trends of randomise…Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education (2016)Reporting quality and risk of…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,754 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Assessment of the reporting quality of RCTs for novel oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease based on the CONSORT statement30 cited
    • 2021Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement30 cited
    • 2016Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education24 cited
    • 2023Methodology reporting improved over time in 176,469 randomized controlled trials19 cited
    • 2022Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility18 cited
    • 2016Reporting trends of randomised controlled trials in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review18 cited
    • 2020A Review of Adherence and Predictors of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials16 cited
    • 2024Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS)16 cited
    • 2019Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study12 cited