Freedom's law: the moral reading of the American Constitution

Unknown author

652 citations0/0 files storedChoice Reviews Online

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

American Constitutional Law and Politics Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Law, Rights, and Freedoms

Abstract

Introduction: The Moral Reading and the Majoritarian Premise PART I: LIFE, DEATH AND RACE 1. Roe in Danger 2. Verdict Postponed 3. What the Constitution Says 4. Roe was Saved 5. Do We Have a Right to Die? 6. Gag Rule and Affirmative Action PART II: SPEECH, CONSCIENCE, SEX AND VOTES 7. The Press on Trial 8. Why Must Speech be Free? 9. Pornography and Hate 10. MacKinnon's Words 11. Why Academic Freedom? PART III: JUDGES 12. Bork: The Senate's Responsibility 13. What Bork's Defeat Meant 14. Bork's Own Postmortem 15. The Thomas Nomination 16. Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas 17. Learned Hand Notes Sources Index

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 652 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2007Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review 2012The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state 2005Constitutional Law and National Pluralism 2019Free Speech and Hate Speech 2004Social Work Values: The Moral Core of the Profession 2006The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects 2006Should the Voting Age be Lowered to Sixteen? Normative and Empirical Considerations 2015Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.