Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials published in neurourology and urodynamics from 1993 to 2012

8 references·2 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias7,306 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,184 cited
2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
2005Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results152 cited
2007A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Urology Literature89 cited
2010Randomized Clinical Trials Presented at the World Congress of Endourology: How Is the Quality of Reporting?23 cited

Cited by

2021Quality Assessment and Relevant Clinical Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials of Varicocele: Next Step to Good-Quality Randomized Controlled Trial of Varicocele Treatment5 cited
2019Trustworthiness of randomized trials in endocrinology—A systematic survey5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work