Rethinking Legal Realism: Toward a Naturalized Jurisprudence

Brian Leiter

128 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Legal and Social Philosophy

Abstract

Abstract This chapter sets out the basic contours of the author's revisionary treatment of Realism. It argues that we can reconstruct the Realists as arguing for their ‘empirical’ approach to the theory of adjudication as motivated by considerations analogous to those Quine invoked for naturalizing epistemology.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 128 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Folk Psychology is Here to Stay

Cited by

2009Legal Realism for Economists 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning 20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy 2006A Realist View of Hindu Law 201016 Expertise of Court Judges 2010Introduction

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.