SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Pharmacological interventions for self-harm in adults
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Pharmacological interventions for self-harm in adults (2015)Pharmacological interventions for self-ha…Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Diagnostic and Statistical Ma…Self-harm and suicide in adolescents (2012)Self-harm and suicide in adol…Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Outlier and influence diagnos…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Suicide Prevention Strategies (2005)Suicide Prevention StrategiesMeasuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Meta-analyses involving cross…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (1983)The Hospital Anxiety and Depr…The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. (1974)The measurement of pessimism:…An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)An Inventory for Measuring De…A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONEmpirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire (1973)A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (1979)The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (1988)The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (2002)The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The CES-D Scale (1977)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)The PHQ-9 (2001)Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report (1982)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research (1989)Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. (1985)Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. (1989)The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010)Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation (1988)The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories (1995)The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders116,254 cited
  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1983The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale47,092 cited
  • 1961An Inventory for Measuring Depression38,018 cited
  • 1960A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION32,812 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1974The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale.5,493 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2010Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis2,932 cited
  • 2005Suicide Prevention Strategies2,850 cited
  • 2012Self-harm and suicide in adolescents2,305 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues
2,300 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.