SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Role of Economic Perspectives and Evidence in Systematic Review
16 references·4 citing·47 second hop
The Role of Economic Perspectives and Evidence in Systematic Review (2010)The Role of Economic Perspectives and Evi…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Searching for Studies (2008)Searching for StudiesComplex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation (2008)Complex interventions or comp…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Analysing Data and Undertakin…Addressing Reporting Biases (2008)Addressing Reporting BiasesEvidence-based Policy (2006)Evidence-based PolicyRealist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (2005)Criteria list for assessment …Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment (2004)Review of guidelines for good…Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis' (2002)Evidence-based Policy: The Pr…Modelling in Ecomomic Evaluation: An Unavoidable Fact of Life (1997)Modelling in Ecomomic Evaluat…Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ (1996)Guidelines for authors and pe…Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis (1995)Best evidence synthesis: An i…Meta-Ethnography (1988)Meta-EthnographyMeta-analysis in social research (1982)Meta-analysis in social resea…Realism and resources: Towards more explanatory economic evaluation (2016)Realism and resources: Toward…The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shared care: protocol for a realist review (2013)The effectiveness and cost-ef…Costing program implementation using systematic reviews: interventions for the prevention of adolescent depression (2012)Costing program implementatio…Evidence synthesis, economics and public policy (2010)Evidence synthesis, economics…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (1987)Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (1996)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases (2006)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations (2022)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. (1998)Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. (1999)The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of Recidivism Studies. (2005)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (2006)Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications (2008)AdViSHE: A Validation-Assessment Tool of Health-Economic Models for Decision Makers and Model Users (2015)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research (2005)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research (2014)Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure (2009)Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research (2015)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Meta-analysis in social research3,912 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 1988Meta-Ethnography2,721 cited
  • 1996Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ1,821 cited
  • 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
  • 2006Evidence-based Policy1,789 cited
  • 1995Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis950 cited
  • 2005Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria858 cited
  • 2002Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis'729 cited
  • 2004Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment697 cited
  • 2008Addressing Reporting Biases651 cited
  • 2008Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation630 cited
  • 2008Searching for Studies599 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1997Modelling in Ecomomic Evaluation: An Unavoidable Fact of Life595 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Realism and resources: Towards more explanatory economic evaluation45 cited
    • 2013The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shared care: protocol for a realist review33 cited
    • 2010Evidence synthesis, economics and public policy29 cited
    • 2012Costing program implementation using systematic reviews: interventions for the prevention of adolescent depression15 cited