Deliberative politics : essays on democracy and disagreement

Abstract

Stephen Macedo: Introduction Part I: The Value of Deliberative Democracy 1.: Frederick Schauer: Talking as a Decision Procedure? 2.: Ian Shapiro: Enough Deliberation: Politics is About Interests and Power 3.: William A. Galston: Diversity, Toleration, and Deliberative Democracy: Religious Minorities and Public Schooling 4.: William H. Simon: Three Limitations of Deliberative Democracy: Identity, Politics, Bad Faith, and Indeterminacy 5.: Michael Walzer: Deliberation, and What Else? 6.: Daniel A. Bell: The Problem of Implementation and the East Asian Context 7.: Stanley Fish: Mutual Respect as a Device of Exclusion 8.: Russell Hardin: Deliberation: Method Not Theory Part II: The Limits of Deliberative Democracy 9.: Cass R. Sunstein: Agreement without Theory 10.: Iris Marion Young: Justice, Inclusion, and Deliberative Democracy 11.: Jack Knight: Constitutionalsim and Deliberative Democracy 12.: Alan Wertheimer: Internal Disagreements: Deliberation and Abortion 13.: Robert P. George: Law, Democracy, and Moral Disagreement: Comparing Slavery and Abortion 14.: Norman Daniels: Enabling Deliberative Deliberation: How Managed Care Organizations Ought to Make Decisions about Coverage for New Technologies 15.: Jane Mansbridge: The Deliberative System and Everyday Talk Part III: Reply to CriticsAmy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson:

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 522 citations exist upstream.