Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published

David Grimm

39 citations0/0 files storedScience

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS-- According to three studies presented here last week at the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, either suggesting or excluding reviewers can significantly increase a manuscript9s chances of being accepted.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2010Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership 2012How to write an article: Preparing a publishable manuscript!2021Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor 2010Ethics in 15 min per Week 2011Conceptual Debates and Empirical Evidence About the Peer Review Process for Scholarly Journals 2018Current Controversies Regarding Peer Review in Scholarly Journals 2022Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos 2009Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Affect Reviewer Behavior?

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.