A New Role for For-Profit Actors? The Case of Anti-Money Laundering and Risk Management

Maria Bergström · Karin Svedberg Helgesson · Ulrika Mörth

52 citations0/0 files storedJCMS Journal of Common Market Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Global Financial Regulation and Crises Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance Regulation and Compliance Studies

Abstract

The article analyses what the third EU Directive on AML (anti-money laundering) and risk management means in terms of democratic accountability when the banking sector is given a role that is traditionally the prerogative of the public actors. The comparison between the UK and Sweden on the private actors' role in various stages of the risk-based decision process shows that the procedures used could jeopardize the traditional liberal understanding of democratic accountability.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

1990The Taming of Chance 1999Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?2000Governance, Politics and the State 1999Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic 2004Public Management Reform 2000Global Business Regulation 1997From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance 2002New Public Management

Cited by

2012The apparatus of fraud risk 2018A risk-based approach towards infringement prevention on the internet: adopting the anti-money laundering framework to online platforms

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.