SStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. · Study

Home/Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.

Suzanne L. West, Timothy S. Carey, Kathleen N Lohr, Naomi A Mckoy, Sonya F Sutton, Linda J Lux

2002-03-01articlePubMed Central880 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Clinical practice guidelines implementation Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 880 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs

1991Publication bias in clinical research

1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews

Cited by

2005Cultural Competence

2007Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2007Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings

2009AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program

2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences

2019Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science

2017Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions

2013Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers

Details

Year2002

Typearticle

VenuePubMed Central

Languageen

Files0 public / 0

Identifiers

openalex_workW1548370045

Links

landingopen ↗

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.