Article2010

Cost‐effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia

Joshua Byrnes · Linda J. Cobiac · Christopher M. Doran · Theo Vos · Anthony P. Shakeshaft

39 citations0/0 files storedThe Medical Journal of Australia

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential health benefits and cost savings of an alcohol tax rate that applies equally to all alcoholic beverages based on their alcohol content (volumetric tax) and to compare the cost savings with the cost of implementation. DESIGN AND SETTING: Mathematical modelling of three scenarios of volumetric alcohol taxation for the population of Australia: (i) no change in deadweight loss, (ii) no change in tax revenue, and (iii) all alcoholic beverages taxed at the same rate as spirits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated change in alcohol consumption, tax revenue and health benefit. RESULTS: The estimated cost of changing to a volumetric tax rate is $18 million. A volumetric tax that is deadweight loss-neutral would increase the cost of beer and wine and reduce the cost of spirits, resulting in an estimated annual increase in taxation revenue of $492 million and a 2.77% reduction in annual consumption of pure alcohol. The estimated net health gain would be 21 000 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), with potential cost offsets of $110 million per annum. A tax revenue-neutral scenario would result in an 0.05% decrease in consumption, and a tax on all alcohol at a spirits rate would reduce consumption by 23.85% and increase revenue by $3094 million [corrected]. All volumetric tax scenarios would provide greater health benefits and cost savings to the health sector than the existing taxation system, based on current understandings of alcohol-related health effects. CONCLUSIONS: An equalized volumetric tax that would reduce beer and wine consumption while increasing the consumption of spirits would need to be approached with caution. Further research is required to examine whether alcohol-related health effects vary by type of alcoholic beverage independent of the amount of alcohol consumed to provide a strong evidence platform for alcohol taxation policies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

2007The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003 2009Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta‐analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies 2008Priority setting in health: origins, description and application of the Australian Assessing Cost–Effectiveness initiative 1998Coping with multiple morbidity in a life table

Cited by

2013Estimated impacts of alternative Australian alcohol taxation structures on consumption, public health and government revenues 2013What should be done about policy on alcohol pricing and promotions? Australian experts’ views of policy priorities: a qualitative interview study 2020How many alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions could be prevented by alternative pricing and taxation policies? Modelling impacts on alcohol consumption, revenues and related harms in Canada

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.