Sociodemographic and Environmental Correlates of Active Commuting in Rural America

Jessie X. Fan · Ming Wen · Lori Kowaleski‐Jones

28 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Rural Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation Planning and Optimization Urban Green Space and Health

Abstract

PURPOSE: This research investigated participation rates in 3 modes of active commuting (AC) and their sociodemographic and physical environmental correlates in rural America. METHODS: The 2000 Census supplemented with other data sets were used to analyze AC rates in percentage of workers walking, biking, and taking public transportation to work in 14,209 nonmetropolitan rural tracts identified by RUCA codes, including 4,067 small rural and 10,142 town-micropolitan rural tracts. Sociodemographic and physical environmental variables were correlated with 3 AC modes simultaneously using Seemingly Unrelated Regression for nonmetro rural, and for small rural and town-micropolitan rural separately. FINDINGS: The average AC rates in rural tracts were 3.63%, 0.26%, and 0.56% for walking, biking, and public transportation to work, respectively, with small rural tracts having a higher rate of walking but lower rates of biking and public transportation to work than town-micropolitan tracts. In general, better economic well-being was negatively associated with AC but percentage of college-educated was a positive correlate. Population density was positively associated with AC but greenness and proximity to parks were negative correlates. However, significant differences existed for different AC modes, and between small rural and town-micropolitan rural tracts. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors explained more variance in AC than physical environmental factors but the detailed relationships were complex, varying by AC mode and by degree of rurality. Any strategy to promote AC in rural America needs to be sensitive to the population size of the area and assessed in a comprehensive manner to avoid a "one size fits all" approach.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.1994The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.1997Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design 1996Income distribution and mortality: cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States 2007Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: A meta-analytic review 2009Active Commuting and Cardiovascular Disease Risk 2008Is Active Commuting the Answer to Population Health?2010Effects of the Built Environment on Physical Activity of Adults Living in Rural Settings

Cited by

2018Evaluating the impact of a newly added commuter rail system on bus ridership: a grouped ordered logit model approach 2019An examination of active travel trends before and after college graduation 2021Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Variabilities in Daily Activity-Travel Patterns: A Networked Spatiotemporal Analysis 2019Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the active commuting behaviors of U.S. Department of the Interior employees

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.