Forensic Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law

Abstract

Abstract The authors explore critical points in the interaction between forensic practice and law and policy. Using forensic assessment and testimony as primary examples, the authors argue that changes in the law as well as forensic practice have transformed the responsibilities of both forensic practitioners and legal actors. The difficulties posed by these changes are discussed in the context of the new evidentiary admissibility requirements created by the U.S. Supreme Court decision inDaubert v. Merrell Dow Chemical(1993), and a number of dilemmas are raised that forensic practitioners, judges, and policy makers will face as a result of this new standard. Additionally, a number of central lessons that can be gleaned from the complex interaction of forensic psychology, law, and policy to date are highlighted and discussed. Finally, future directions for the field of forensic practice are also offered, including the role that forensic practitioners should play in shaping future policy and law.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.