The World Cup of Economics Journals: A Ranking by a Tournament Method

László Á. Kóczy · Martin Strobel

21 citations0/0 files storedRePEc: Research Papers in Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

A ranking of journals is manipulable if a particular journal's position can be improved by making additional citations to other journals. We introduce a simple ranking method that is not manipulable and is invariant to citation intensities, journal scaling and article-splitting. The ranking of economics journals is presented and is compared to rankings by alternative methods in the recent years.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation 2006A Hirsch-type index for journals 1976Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics 2003Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics 1983Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals 1994The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990 1997Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting

Cited by

2012The intellectual influence of economic journals: quality versus quantity

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.