SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fine-Tuning the Institutional Repository: Evaluating the Self-Archiving Behavior of Researchers in Music
4 references·0 citing·19 second hop
Fine-Tuning the Institutional Repository: Evaluating the Self-Archiving Behavior of Researchers in Music (2012)Fine-Tuning the Institutional Repository:…Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination (2011)Scholarly Communication 2.0: …Self-Archiving Journal Articles: A Case Study of Faculty Practice and Missed Opportunity (2009)Self-Archiving Journal Articl…Self‐archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences (2006)Self‐archiving practice and t…Open access self-archiving: An author study. Technical Report, Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), UK FE and HE funding councils (2005)Open access self-archiving: A…Open access self-archiving: An author study (2005)Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact (2006)An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management (2011)Faculty adoption and usage behaviour of open access scholarly communication in health science universities (2014)Measuring compliance with a S panish G overnment open access mandate (2015)The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (1986)Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR (2008)In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing (2009)Will Open Access Get Me Cited? An Analysis of the Efficacy of Open Access Publishing in Political Science (2014)Motivations for self‐archiving on an academic social networking site: A study on researchgate (2019)Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology (2004)Internet encyclopaedias go head to head (2005)4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2012)Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0 (2012)Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms (2015)Scholarly Twitter Metrics (2019)The value of using short-format podcasts to enhance learning and teaching (2009)Online Access and the Scientific Journal Market: An Economist's Perspective (2011)Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS) (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination98 cited
  • 2006Self‐archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences71 cited
  • 2009Self-Archiving Journal Articles: A Case Study of Faculty Practice and Missed Opportunity48 cited
  • 2005Open access self-archiving: An author study. Technical Report, Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), UK FE and HE funding councils29 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work