Articlegreen1992

The Privatization of Family Law

66 citations0/0 files storedDigital Commons at University of Maryland Carey Law (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Family and Matrimonial Law Legal principles and applications Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies

Abstract

STATES 261-69 (1968).Intentional interference in the parent-child relationship was also actionable, via suits by parents for abduction, enticement and seduction of a daughter.Id. at 269-72. 4.Id. at 272-78. 5.Courts today are still reluctant to apply these doctrines to nonmarital intimate relationships.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1998Group Identity and Women’s Rights in Family Law: The Perils of Multicultural Accommodation 2000A critical reappraisal of divorce mediation research and policy.2007Framing Divorce Reform: Media, Morality, and the Politics of Family 2010The role of interactional competence in mediation 2013In Defense of Surrogacy Agreements: A Modern Contract Law Perspective 2019How Mediation Works 2014The Contractualization of Family Law in the United States 1995Solomon Revisited: Assigning Parenthood in the Context of Collaborative Reproduction

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.