SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Overview of methods for comparing the efficacies of drugs in the absence of head‐to‐head clinical trial data
2 references·1 citing·14 second hop
Overview of methods for comparing the efficacies of drugs in the absence of head‐to‐head clinical trial data (2013)Overview of methods for comparing the eff…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Mapping the characteristics of network meta-analyses on drug therapy: A systematic review (2018)Mapping the characteristics o…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Mapping the characteristics of meta-analyses of pharmacy services: a systematic review (2020)Epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of network meta-analysis in anaesthesia: a systematic review (2022)Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool) (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Mapping the characteristics of network meta-analyses on drug therapy: A systematic review24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work