SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope
16 references·9 citing·21 second hop
Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope (2003)Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Sco…Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: a Manual (2002)Economic Valuation with State…Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques (2002)Economic Valuation with State…The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation (2001)The Choice Modelling Approach…Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin? (2001)Choice Modelling Approaches: …Stated Choice Methods (2000)Stated Choice MethodsStated choice methods analysis and applications (2000)Stated choice methods analysi…Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation (1998)Stated Preference Approaches …Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People (1998)Recreation Demand Models with…A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation (1996)A comparison of stated prefer…Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities (1994)Combining Revealed and Stated…Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (1993)Contingent Valuation: A Criti…Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method (1989)Using surveys to value public…On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities (1986)On Approximating the Statisti…Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses (1984)Welfare Evaluations in Contin…Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? (1979)Measuring Values of Extramark…Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Conditional logit analysis of…Estimating what US residential customers are willing to pay for resilience to large electricity outages of long duration (2020)Estimating what US residentia…Are air travellers willing to pay for reducing or offsetting carbon emissions? Evidence from Italy (2020)Are air travellers willing to…Valuing cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation and choice experiment study in China (2018)Valuing cultivated land prote…Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis (2016)Wind power externalities: A m…Product Line Extension in Consumer Software Markets in the Presence of Free Alternatives (2016)Product Line Extension in Con…Temporal stability of preferences and willingness to pay for natural areas in choice experiments: A test–retest (2014)Temporal stability of prefere…Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process? (2012)Choice experiment, multiple p…Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers (2008)Willingness to pay for enviro…Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food (2007)Scope insensitivity in health…Status quo bias in decision making (1988)Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment (1998)Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy (1980)Macroeconomics and Reality (1980)Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2001)Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions (2003)Incentive and informational properties of preference questions (2007)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks (2004)Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application (2019)Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach (2002)Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation (1991)Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation (1994)The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice (2003)Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior (2015)Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature (2010)On the appropriate objective function for post‐disaster humanitarian logistics models (2013)Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making (2008)Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force (2011)Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force (2013)Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction (1992)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior14,281 cited
  • 2000Stated choice methods analysis and applications4,596 cited
  • 1989Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method4,215 cited
  • 2000Stated Choice Methods3,818 cited
  • 1984Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses2,818 cited
  • 1986On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities2,382 cited
  • 1994Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities1,477 cited
  • 2002Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: a Manual1,443 cited
  • 1998Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation1,416 cited
  • 2002Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques1,384 cited
  • 1979Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?1,176 cited
  • 1993Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment1,115 cited
  • 2001Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin?1,112 cited
  • 1998Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People1,049 cited
  • 2001The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

779 cited
  • 1996A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation723 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Estimating what US residential customers are willing to pay for resilience to large electricity outages of long duration93 cited
    • 2007Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food87 cited
    • 2008Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers85 cited
    • 2016Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis82 cited
    • 2014Temporal stability of preferences and willingness to pay for natural areas in choice experiments: A test–retest76 cited
    • 2012Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process?75 cited
    • 2018Valuing cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation and choice experiment study in China72 cited
    • 2020Are air travellers willing to pay for reducing or offsetting carbon emissions? Evidence from Italy71 cited
    • 2016Product Line Extension in Consumer Software Markets in the Presence of Free Alternatives19 cited