SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court
16 references·4 citing·30 second hop
Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court (2012)Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the …Beyond the formalist-realist divide: the role of politics in judging (2010)Beyond the formalist-realist …Supreme Court Decision Making (2005)Supreme Court Decision MakingSpatial Models of Parliamentary Voting (2005)Spatial Models of Parliamenta…The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)The Supreme Court and the att…The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)The Supreme Court and the Att…Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimatio…The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court (2001)The Norm of Consensus on the …Crafting law on the Supreme Court: the collegial game (2001)Crafting law on the Supreme C…Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court (1998)Of Time and Consensual Norms …The choices justices make (1997)The choices justices makeThe Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)The Supreme Court and the Att…Membership Change and Collective Voting Change in the United States Supreme Court (1992)Membership Change and Collect…On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court (1988)On the Mysterious Demise of C…Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978 (1981)Personal Attribute Models of …The Roosevelt Court (1948)The Roosevelt CourtDivisions of Opinion Among Justices of the U. S. Supreme Court, 1939–1941 (1941)Divisions of Opinion Among Ju…Estimating judicial ideal points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The case of administrative review (2017)Estimating judicial ideal poi…Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court (2016)Public Opinion, Public Suppor…Discouraging Dissent (2016)Discouraging DissentAn empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014 (2015)An empirical analysis of cons…The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Democratic politics in the European Parliament (2008)Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace (2011)Why Hasn't Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality? (2013)What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data (1995)The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures (2011)Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (2013)Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data (2014)Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making (2004)Courts under constraints: judges, generals, and presidents in Argentina (2005)On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public (2012)The Judicial Common Space (2007)The Handbook of Organizational Economics (2013)A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States (2017)Governing with Judges (2000)Judicial Review in New Democracies (2003)Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State (1992)Elaborating the “New Institutionalism” (2009)Symbolic Politics (1993)The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression (1993)Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress (1999)Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda (2004)Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, A Look Ahead (2000)Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2003)Unifying the field of comparative judicial politics: towards a general theory of judicial behaviour (2010)A General Theory of Domination and Justice (2010)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited1,172 cited
  • 2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–19991,145 cited
  • 1993The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model979 cited
  • 2003The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited857 cited
  • 1997The choices justices make794 cited
  • 2005Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting637 cited
  • 2001Crafting law on the Supreme Court: the collegial game511 cited
  • 2005Supreme Court Decision Making455 cited
  • 1981Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978303 cited
  • 1948The Roosevelt Court206 cited
  • 1988On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court162 cited
  • 2010Beyond the formalist-realist divide: the role of politics in judging140 cited
  • 1998Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court114 cited
  • 2001The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court105 cited
  • 1992Membership Change and Collective Voting Change in the United States Supreme Court90 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1941Divisions of Opinion Among Justices of the U. S. Supreme Court, 1939–194187 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–201427 cited
    • 2016Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court23 cited
    • 2017Estimating judicial ideal points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The case of administrative review19 cited
    • 2016Discouraging Dissent16 cited