SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
COMENTÁRIO EDITORIAL O PROCESSO EDITORIAL. DA SUBMISSÃO À REJEIÇÃO (OU ACEITE)
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
COMENTÁRIO EDITORIAL O PROCESSO EDITORIAL. DA SUBMISSÃO À REJEIÇÃO (OU ACEITE) (2013)COMENTÁRIO EDITORIAL O PROCESSO EDITORIAL…Is Peer Review Censorship? (2009)Is Peer Review Censorship?Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies (2008)Quality journals and gamesman…The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas. (2007)The As-Is Journal Review Proc…Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies* (2007)Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality…Reasons for Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to AJR by International Authors (2007)Reasons for Rejection of Manu…Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus (2006)Peer Review in the Organizati…On the Review Process and Journal Development (2006)On the Review Process and Jou…How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)How Much Better Are the Most-…The Manuscript Review Process (2003)The Manuscript Review ProcessReviewing the reviewers (2003)Reviewing the reviewersPublishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success (2003)Publishing as Prostitution? –…Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process (2003)Impartial Judgment by the “Ga…Getting your paper to the right journal: a case study of an academic paper (2002)Getting your paper to the rig…THE REVIEW PROCESS AND THE FATES OF MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO AMJ. (1995)THE REVIEW PROCESS AND THE FA…Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review (1994)Structural Transformations of…Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts (1990)Problems Identified by Second…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs (2011)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? (1993)El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): muchos problemas y pocas soluciones (2002)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable (2009)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The sociology of science (1973)Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal (2007)Logic of Scientific Discovery, The (2010)INDUCTIVE TOP-DOWN THEORIZING: A SOURCE OF NEW THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION. (2011)NEW KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTS AS BRICOLAGE: METAPHORS AND SCRIPTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY. (2011)Men and Women of the Corporation. (1978)A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research (2007)From Scarcity to Abundance: Scholars and Scholarship in an Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2023)The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: a systematic review (2023)Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable (1993)GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION. (2011)Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research (2012)The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (1976)Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology (1992)Beyond Formulaic Research: In Praise of Greater Diversity in Organizational Research and Publications (2013)American Economic Review (2019)A bibliometric review of the leadership development field: How we got here, where we are, and where we are headed (2020)A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript (2005)Manuscript Rejection (2014)Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups (2023)The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing (2024)The psychology of interpersonal relations. (1958)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Means versus Ends in Opaque Institutional Fields: Trading off Compliance and Achievement in Sustainability Standard Adoption (2014)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)Expressive behavior in economics and politics (2010)ARE ALL ECONOMIC FACTS GREATLY EXAGGERATED? THEORY COMPETITION AND SELECTIVITY (2011)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication434 cited
  • 2007Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies*298 cited
  • 2003Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success296 cited
  • 2003Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process199 cited
  • 2003The Manuscript Review Process179 cited
  • 1995THE REVIEW PROCESS AND THE FATES OF MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO AMJ.141 cited
  • 2006Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus134 cited
  • 2007The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas.105 cited
  • 2007Reasons for Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to AJR by International Authors77 cited
  • 1990Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts72 cited
  • 1994Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review64 cited
  • 2002Getting your paper to the right journal: a case study of an academic paper61 cited
  • 2006On the Review Process and Journal Development52 cited
  • 2008Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies44 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003
Reviewing the reviewers
32 cited
  • 2009Is Peer Review Censorship?32 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.