For the Record: which digital media are good for sociophonetic analysis?

Paul De Decker · Jennifer Nycz

43 citations0/0 files storedFigshare

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistic Variation and Morphology Phonetics and Phonology Research Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

Abstract

Linguists now have more options for collecting naturalistic speech data than ever before. But digital compression techniques simplifiy some frequency content and discard others (Bulgin, De Decker & Nycz 2010). Lower-quality microphones may also distort the acoustic signal. Therefore, before such data can be used for sociophonetic research, it is crucial to determine the degree to which these media affect the reliability of acoustic analysis (Gonzalez et al. 2001, 2003).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2021Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely 2022Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely 2020Production and perception of the P in -P en merger 2018The Language of Diasporic Blogs 2018Multilingual Youth Practices in Computer Mediated Communication 2019Media and Second Dialect Acquisition 2021Editorial: using smartphones to collect linguistic data 2021Stimmen: A citizen science approach to minority language sociolinguistics

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.