SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor
7 references·16 citing·39 second hop
Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor (2015)Retraction policies of top scientific jou…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews (2022)Retracted publications in pha…Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers (2022)Dynamics of cross-platform at…Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020 (2021)Team size and retracted citat…Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities (2021)Research ethics: a profile of…The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry (2020)The continued citation of ret…The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct (2019)The landscape of urological r…Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines (2019)Journals’ instructions to aut…Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct? (2019)Is it time to revise the defi…Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey (2018)Exploring the characteristics…Correction and retraction practices in library and information science journals (2018)Correction and retraction pra…An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes? (2018)An analysis of Malaysian retr…Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error (2017)Doing the Right Thing: A Qual…Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity (2017)Data-Intensive Science and Re…A Multidimensional Investigation of the Effects of Publication Retraction on Scholarly Impact (2017)A Multidimensional Investigat…Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context (2016)Notices and Policies for Retr…An investigation of retracted articles in the biomedical literature (2016)An investigation of retracted…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Exploratory Research (2020)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals (2012)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)A survey of retracted articles in dentistry (2017)Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016) (2017)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)Committee on publication ethics (2010)Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years (2024)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science (2024)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context69 cited
  • 2022Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers57 cited
  • 2019Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?56 cited
  • 2017Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error52 cited
  • 2019Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines51 cited
  • 2017A Multidimensional Investigation of the Effects of Publication Retraction on Scholarly Impact48 cited
  • 2021Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

45 cited
  • 2018Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey45 cited
  • 2021Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities42 cited
  • 2018An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes?40 cited
  • 2017Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity38 cited
  • 2016An investigation of retracted articles in the biomedical literature36 cited
  • 2022Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews34 cited
  • 2018Correction and retraction practices in library and information science journals33 cited
  • 2020The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry33 cited
  • 2019The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct32 cited