SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: direct and indirect treatment comparisons.
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: direct and indirect treatment comparisons. (2011)Network meta-analysis of randomised contr…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisThe PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Mixed Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions: Psychological Interventions in Coronary Heart Disease (2009)Mixed Treatment Comparison Me…Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews (2009)Methodological problems in th…Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Assessing Evidence Inconsiste…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (2003)Validity of indirect comparis…A chain of evidence with mixed comparisons: models for multi‐parameter synthesis and consistency of evidence (2003)A chain of evidence with mixe…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Explaining heterogeneity in m…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS (1996)BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTER…Stochastically dependent effect sizes. (1994)Stochastically dependent effe…Critical quality evaluation of network meta-analyses in dental care (2018)Critical quality evaluation o…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate (2003)Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 1999Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods1,733 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
  • 2006Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons755 cited
  • 1996BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS560 cited
  • 1994Stochastically dependent effect sizes.485 cited
  • 2009Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews395 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2009Mixed Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions: Psychological Interventions in Coronary Heart Disease363 cited
  • 2003A chain of evidence with mixed comparisons: models for multi‐parameter synthesis and consistency of evidence128 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Critical quality evaluation of network meta-analyses in dental care19 cited