How to Appraise the Studies: An Introduction to Assessing Study Quality

Mark Patrick Petticrew · Helen M Roberts

63 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Sciences Research and Education Health Policy Implementation Science

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Non-Reporting by Authors: When no News Isn't Always Good News What is Study Quality? Critical Appraisal: Too Much Criticism, not Enough Appraisal? The Hierarchy of Evidence Again In Search of the Methodological ''holy Grail'' Critical Appraisal: Tools, Scales and Checklists Inside the Black Box: Assessing the Implementation of the Intervention Treatment Integrity, Implementation, and Context Assessing External Validity Quality Assessment and Qualitative Research Does Quality Assessment Matter? Data Extraction Checking the Reliability of Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction Extracting Data on Differential Effects of Interventions Translating Non-English Papers Concluding Comments

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 63 citations exist upstream.

References

2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.1982Judgment under Uncertainty 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias 2000Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies

Cited by

2024Understanding the Relationship between Urban Public Space and Social Cohesion: A Systematic Review 2018Comparative studies of water governance: a systematic review 2017The effectiveness of strength-based, solution-focused brief therapy in medical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2019Educational gender gaps and economic growth: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis 2020

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.