Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why Jane Austen Was Different, And Why We May Need Cognitive Science To See It

6 references·9 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1739A Treatise of Human Nature9,842 cited
2001Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action3,304 cited
1990Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century336 cited
1977The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century201 cited
2007A Sentimental Journey75 cited
2004I know that you know that I know: narrating subjects from Moll Flanders to Marnie59 cited

Cited by

2014Theory of Mind: Did Evolution Fool Us?101 cited
2008An Evolutionary Paradigm for Literary Study75 cited
2012Narrated perception revisited: The case of Jane Austen’s Emma52 cited
2008Review Article: The year's work in stylistics 200725 cited
2011Thinking about other people in nineteenth-century British writing23 cited
2021Art films foster theory of mind17 cited
2014Theory of Mind as a Pedagogical Tool15 cited
2010Elsa's reason: On beliefs and motives in Wagner'sLohengrin6 cited
2014'Though This Be Madness, Yet There is Method In't': A Counterfactual Analysis of Richard Wagner's 'Tannhauser'3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work