Psychology’s Territories. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines

Mitchell G. Ash · Thomas Sturm

44 citations0/0 files storedHistory & Philosophy of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Philosophy and Theoretical Science Free Will and Agency

Abstract

Contents: P.B. Baltes, Foreword. Introduction: M.G. Ash, Psychological Thought and Practice: Historical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Part I: Psychological Concepts in Different Domains: Shared or Divided Meanings? Attention: S. Luders, Fluctuations of Attention Between Physiology, Experimental Psychology, and Psychotechnical Application. Intention and Will: J. Brandtstdter, Causality, Intentionality, and the Causation of Intentions: The Problematic Boundary. W. Prinz, A Critique of Free Will: Psychological Remarks on a Social Institution. M. Heidelberger, Freedom AND Science! The Presumptuous Metaphysics of Free Will Disdainers. S. Maasen, Governing by Will-The Shaping of the Will in Self-Help Manuals. The Self: J.G. Morawski, Scientific Selves: Discerning Subjects and Experimenters in Experimental Psychology in the United States, 1900-1935. K.J. Gergen, The Self: Colonization in Psychology and Society. T. Sturm, The Self Between Psychology and Philosophy: The Case of Self-Deception. Part II: Roles of Instruments in Psychological Research. Instruments as Organizers of Research Practices: H. Gundlach, What Is a Psychological Instrument? F. Strack, N. Schwarz, Asking Questions: Measurement in the Social Sciences. Instruments at Disciplinary Frontiers: Psychology and the Neurosciences: G. Roth, T.F. Munte, H.J. Heinze, Can the Psyche Be Visualized by the Neurosciences? R. Bsel, Brain Imaging Methods and the Study of Cognitive Processes: Potentials and Limits. M. Hagner, Mind Reading, Brain Mirror, Neuroimaging: Insight Into the Brain or the Mind? Instruments as Metaphors for Psychological Objects: G. Gigerenzer, T. Sturm, Tools=Theories=Data? On Some Circular Dynamics in Cognitive Science. Conclusion: J. Capshew, Reflexivity Revisited: Changing Psychology's Frame of Reference.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

References

1939The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis 2003Handbook of psychological assessment, 4th ed.1995Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity.2004Thing knowledge: a philosophy of scientific instruments 1906Experimental Psychology, a Manual of Laboratory Practice.2005Physics, Ballistics, and Psychology: A History of the Chronoscope in/as Context, 1845-1890.

Cited by

2015On the Meanings of Self-Regulation: Digital Humanities in Service of Conceptual Clarity 2019How to Explain Behavior?2016Beyond the “Variables”: Developing Metalanguage for Psychology 2017MENTAL ASSOCIATION: TESTING INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES BEFORE BINET 2015Screening the Psychological Laboratory: Hugo Münsterberg, Psychotechnics, and the Cinema, 1892–1916 2014Heuristic Appraisal at the Frontier of Research 2012Critical Comments on Experimental, Discursive, and General Social Psychology 2010

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.