No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
In a pioneering study on bilingual Hebrew–Latin Bible codices from medieval England, Raphael Loewe highlighted a marked discrepancy between, on the one hand, the interest displayed by Christian scholars in the Hebrew Bible and its Jewish exegesis and, on the other hand, their lack of concern with methodical or structured descriptions of the Hebrew language itself. Indeed, it seems that no comprehensive treatise or textbook of Hebrew grammar was produced during the twelfth and the thirteenth centuries, a period of intensive Christian study of Hebrew sources. While they encountered a wide range of Hebrew texts, Christian scholars of the period do not seem to have displayed much interest in their purely linguistic or grammatical dimensions. The fact that a complex theory of Hebrew grammar was not developed by Christian scholars is understandable, given that Latin grammar itself was struggling at that time to acquire its status as a scientia . What is far more surprising, however, is that there existed virtually no pedagogical aids or manuals to assist to access the original texts. So far as the twelfth century is concerned, this indifference to the study of the Hebrew language could be related to the well-known fact that Christian scholars of the time approached the Hebrew sources through competent Jewish teachers, with whom they interacted in the vernacular French.With notable exceptions, such as Herbert of Bosham (d. after 1190) who could study Rashi commentaries by himself, Christian scholars throughout the twelfth century had to call upon Jewish scholars or converts in their study of the Hebrew Bible and rabbinic literature.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 100 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.