What Determines Giving to Hurricane Katrina Victims? Experimental Evidence on Income, Race, and Fairness

Abstract

We investigate determinants of private and public generosity to Katrina victims using an artifactual field experiment.In this experiment, respondents from the general population viewed a short audiovisual presentation that manipulated respondents' perceptions of the income, race, and deservingness of Katrina victims in one of two small cities.Respondents then decided how to split $100 between themselves and a charity helping Katrina victims in this small city.We also collected survey data on subjective support for government spending to help the Katrina victims in the cities.We find, first, that our income manipulation had a significant effect on giving; respondents gave more when they perceived the victims to be poorer.Second, the race and deservingness manipulations had virtually no effect on average giving.Third, the averages mask substantial racial bias among sub-groups of our sample.For instance, the subgroup of whites who identify with their ethnic or racial group strongly biased their giving against blacks.Finally, subjective support for government spending to help Katrina victims was significantly influenced by both our race and deservingness manipulations, but not by the income manipulation.White respondents supported significantly less public spending for black victims and significantly more for victims who were described in more flattering terms, such as being helpful and law-abiding.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.