SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors: Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies
0 references·15 citing·26 second hop
Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors: Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies (2004)Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Err…When can the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method be used and when it should not be used (2021)When can the Bland & Altman l…Assessing Quality in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Study of Novice Rater Training (2020)Assessing Quality in Systemat…A new statistical methodology overcame the defects of the Bland–Altman method (2020)A new statistical methodology…Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies (2019)Assessing bias, precision, an…MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies (2018)MethodCompare: An R package t…Comparing heteroscedastic measurement systems with the probability of agreement (2017)Comparing heteroscedastic mea…Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies (2017)Biasplot: A Package to Effect…How to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation (2016)How to assess intra- and inte…Effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies (2016)Effective plots to assess bia…Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach (2015)Assessing agreement between t…Everything all right in method comparison studies? (2010)Everything all right in metho…Interrater reliability and the kappa statistic: A comment on Morris et al. (2008) (2008)Interrater reliability and th…Classical latent variable models for medical research (2007)Classical latent variable mod…Assessing agreement of measurements and predictions in geomorphology (2006)Assessing agreement of measur…Reliability of nutritional screening and assessment tools (2004)Reliability of nutritional sc…STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility (1989)Measuring agreement in method comparison studies (1999)Biogeomorphology: understanding different research approaches (2010)Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies (1983)Bland and Altman agreement method: to plot differences against means or differences against standard? An endless tale? (2023)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit (1992)The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis (2010)The use of latent class analysis for identifying subtypes of depression: A systematic review (2018)Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample (2018)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools (2004)New clinicians require ongoing training to ensure high inter-rater reliability of the Subjective Global Assessment (2012)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)Why Bland–Altman plots should use X , not ( Y + X )/2 when X is a reference method (2007)An Extension of the Bland–Altman Plot for Analyzing the Agreement of More than Two Raters (2021)The Bland-Altman method should not be used when one of the two measurement methods has negligible measurement errors (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Challenges and critical success factors of digital communication, collaboration and knowledge sharing in project management virtual teams: a review (2022)Learning processes and their mediating role between teaching quality and student achievement: A systematic review (2022)Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2007Classical latent variable models for medical research141 cited
  • 2004Reliability of nutritional screening and assessment tools72 cited
  • 2015Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach57 cited
  • 2021When can the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method be used and when it should not be used52 cited
  • 2016Effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies42 cited
  • 2020Assessing Quality in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Study of Novice Rater Training40 cited
  • 2006Assessing agreement of measurements and predictions in geomorphology34 cited
  • 2020A new statistical methodology overcame the defects of the Bland–Altman method33 cited
  • 2019Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies30 cited
  • 2018MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies28 cited
  • 2017Comparing heteroscedastic measurement systems with the probability of agreement27 cited
  • 2008Interrater reliability and the kappa statistic: A comment on Morris et al. (2008)22 cited
  • 2016How to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017
Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies
16 cited
  • 2010Everything all right in method comparison studies?15 cited