Some Process Capability Indices are More Reliable than One Might Think

Samuel Kotz · W. L. Pearn · Norman Lloyd Johnson

86 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring Management and Optimization Techniques Fault Detection and Control Systems

Abstract

Samuel Kotz, Wen Lea Pearn, N. L. Johnson, Some Process Capability Indices are More Reliable than One Might Think, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), Vol. 42, No. 1 (1993), pp. 55-62

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.

References

1995Process Capability Indices.1988A New Measure of Process Capability:Cpm 1989Process Capability Calculations for Non-Normal Distributions 1990How Reliable is Your Capability Index?

Cited by

2001A new process capability index for non‐normal distributions 1997An application of non-normal process capability indices 1998New generalization of process capability index Cpk 1995Estimating process capability indices for non‐normal pearsonian populations 2007Decision-making in testing process performance with fuzzy data 1999Making decisions in assessing process capability indexCpk 2001Capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerances 1999A Bayesian procedure for process capability assessment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.