SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty‐first century
2 references·5 citing·28 second hop
The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty‐first century (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration: International…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions? (2003)How many Cochrane reviews are…Much at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis (2017)Much at stake: the importance…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews (2015)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Visualization of evidence‐based medicine domain knowledge: production and citation of cochrane systematic reviews (2013)Visualization of evidence‐bas…Two-thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis (2012)Two-thirds of methodological …DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?Application in practice (2011)DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABAS…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Negative Results and Impact Factor (2005)Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review (2019)Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study (2022)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2002)Research synthesis and dissemination as a bridge to knowledge management: the Cochrane Collaboration. (2004)Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review (2019)Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2003How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions?70 cited

Cited by

  • 2011DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?Application in practice19 cited
  • 2012Two-thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis17 cited
  • 2015Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews16 cited
  • 2017Much at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis14 cited
  • 2013Visualization of evidence‐based medicine domain knowledge: production and citation of cochrane systematic reviews12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work