Article1999

Who is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe?: Three Conceptions of the Relationship Between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice

193 citations0/0 files storedCommon Market Law Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

European and International Law Studies Judicial and Constitutional Studies Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies

Abstract

View Who is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe?: Three Conceptions of the Relationship Between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice by Mattias Kumm - Common Market Law Review

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 193 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2010The European Court of Justice and the judicialization of EU governance 2008The Legacy of the Maastricht‐Urteil and the Pluralist Movement 2012Global constitutionalism: Human rights, democracy and the rule of law 2005EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe 2003Recasting European Welfare States 2009Conflicts of Rights in the European Union 2006Legal Pluralism and the European Union 2003Europeanization and the Persistence of Administrative Systems

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.