Evaluating Integrated Project Delivery Using the Project Quarterback Rating

Mounir El Asmar · Awad S. Hanna · Wei‐Yin Loh

110 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Construction Engineering and Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Construction Project Management and Performance BIM and Construction Integration Value Engineering and Management

Abstract

This paper presents the development, validation, and implementation of an innovative comprehensive project performance metric specifically developed for architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) projects. The project quarterback rating (PQR) combines key performance metrics of a project into a single number to provide a basis for quantifying project success. The combined performance areas include customer relations, schedule and budget compliance, quality and safety statistics, financial metrics, and communication among the different project stakeholders. The existing literature is analyzed to identify key performance metrics. A data-collection instrument is developed and then used to gather quantitative performance data from recently completed projects. Data are collected from industry professionals across the United States, and multivariate data analysis techniques are used to validate the model. PQR can compare the overall performance for different AEC projects, in addition to the performance of various project delivery systems. In this paper, PQR scores are calculated for projects completed under different delivery systems. The results clearly show differences in performance for projects delivered with design-bid-build (DBB), construction management at risk (CMR), design-build (DB), and integrated project delivery (IPD). This paper offers three major contributions to the construction engineering and management literature: (1) it presents the development and validation of the comprehensive performance model; (2) it provides the first comparison of project delivery systems through a single comprehensive metric; and (3) it offers an evaluation of the emerging IPD system, demonstrating superior overall performance when compared with other delivery systems.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 110 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis 2004Key performance indicators for measuring construction success 1998Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems 2002Framework of Success Criteria for Design/Build Projects 2013Quantifying Performance for the Integrated Project Delivery System as Compared to Established Delivery Systems 2003Project Delivery Systems and Project Change: Quantitative Analysis 1999Public-Sector Design/Build Evolution and Performance 1996Selecting Design-Build: Public and Private Sector Owner Attitudes

Cited by

2020Construction project performance areas for Indian construction projects 2020COLLABORATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS: A SCOPING REVIEW 2019Effectiveness of Project Delivery Systems in Executing Green Buildings 2019Early Stages in the Institutionalization of Integrated Project Delivery 2020Critical Review of the Evolution of Project Delivery Methods in the Construction Industry 2018

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.