SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence‐based medicine age
4 references·2 citing·23 second hop
Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence‐based medicine age (2012)Systematic reviews showed insufficient ev…Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care (2007)Mapping the Cochrane evidence…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence (1997)Systematic Reviews: Critical …Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS’ VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE (2018)PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS…Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews published in prominent medical journals: a methodological review (2015)Eligibility criteria in syste…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration (2006)Burnout in Sport: A Systematic Review (2007)Intimate Partner Violence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (2012)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options (2015)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2022)An alternative approach to deal with the absence of clinical trials: a proportional meta-analysis of case series studies (2013)Research Trends in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of More than 50 Years of Publication Data (2015)The quality of evidence for medical interventions does not improve or worsen: a metaepidemiological study of Cochrane reviews (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence262 cited
  • 2007Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care96 cited

Cited by

  • 2018PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS’ VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE13 cited
  • 2015Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews published in prominent medical journals: a methodological review12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work