Articlegreen2008

Integrating Mediation into Arbitration:Why It Works in China

49 citations0/0 files storedJournal of International Arbitration

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Arbitration and Investment Law Dispute Resolution and Class Actions Comparative and International Law Studies

Abstract

Despite the divergent views on the acceptability of arbitrators facilitating settlement in a pending arbitration, a merged system seems to work well in Asia, especially in China due to its legal culture that emphasizes mediation. This article examines the reasons why mediation has been successfully integrated into arbitration in China from its specific historical, cultural and political perspectives, and analyzes how it could impact the contemporary practice of integrating mediation into arbitration in the world.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2007Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?: The 2006 Freshfields Lecture 2009When Arbitrators Facilitate Settlement: Towards a Transnational Standard: Clayton Utz/University of Sydney International Arbitration Lecture

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.