Does educational integrity mean teaching students NOT to 'use their own words'?

Ursula McGowan

56 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal for Educational Integrity

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic Writing and Publishing Discourse Analysis in Language Studies

Abstract

In the face of increasing evidence of plagiarism in higher education the maintenance of educational integrity relies on the capacity of universities to strengthen their systems for consistent detection of and penalties for deliberate plagiarism, cheating and other fraudulent practices. However, there is a danger that the resolve to do so may be weakened if these systems become overloaded by the detection of a high incidence of unintentional plagiarism. The focus of this paper is on international students for whom English is an additional language (EAL) and whose plagiarism is most easily recognised, as many set out on their degree courses with no experience in a Western academic environment, an unsteady command of English grammar and a relatively limited range of vocabulary. The advice to 'use their own words' in order to avoid accidental plagiarism may be more confusing than helpful for them. This paper proposes that far from trapping students in their existing repertoire of words, the teaching, assessment and feedback advice provided within university courses should explicitly support their students' development of the formal language that is valued in academic writing. It is suggested that the basis for doing so is an understanding of the essential differences between informal, spoken language and the more formal style required in written assignments. An educational approach that successfully removes innocent plagiarists from the disciplinary system could become a means for assuring a university's educational integrity. Keywords: plagiarism, 'own words', spoken and written language, re-usable language, international students, English as an Additional Language (EAL).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

References

1995An introduction to functional grammar . 2nd edn. By M. A. K. Halliday London, Melbourne, & Auckland: Edward Arnold, 1994. Pp. XXXV, 434.1987Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective 1994An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics 2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications 1994Writing science: Literacy and discursive power 2004Research Genres 1993Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power 1998Spoken and written language

Cited by

2016Taiwanese College Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism: Cultural and Educational Considerations 2014Measuring students' perceptions of plagiarism: modification and Rasch validation of a plagiarism attitude scale.2013Academic staff's perspectives upon student plagiarism: a case study at a university in Hong Kong 2013Placing the Library at the Heart of Plagiarism Prevention: The University of Bradford Experience 2015International Student Perceptions of Ethics in a Business Pathway Course

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.