Linking mothers and infants within electronic health records: a comparison of deterministic and probabilistic algorithms

Eric A. Baldwin · Karin E. Johnson · Heidi Berthoud · Sascha Dublin

40 citations0/0 files storedPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Data Quality and Management Electronic Health Records Systems Medical Coding and Health Information

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare probabilistic and deterministic algorithms for linking mothers and infants within electronic health records (EHRs) to support pregnancy outcomes research. METHODS: The study population was women enrolled in Group Health (Washington State, USA) delivering a liveborn infant from 2001 through 2008 (N = 33,093 deliveries) and infant members born in these years. We linked women to infants by surname, address, and dates of birth and delivery using deterministic and probabilistic algorithms. In a subset previously linked using "gold standard" identifiers (N = 14,449), we assessed each approach's sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). For deliveries with no "gold standard" linkage (N = 18,644), we compared the algorithms' linkage proportions. We repeated our analyses in an independent test set of deliveries from 2009 through 2013. We reviewed medical records to validate a sample of pairs apparently linked by one algorithm but not the other (N = 51 or 1.4% of discordant pairs). RESULTS: In the 2001-2008 "gold standard" population, the probabilistic algorithm's sensitivity was 84.1% (95% CI, 83.5-84.7) and PPV 99.3% (99.1-99.4), while the deterministic algorithm had sensitivity 74.5% (73.8-75.2) and PPV 95.7% (95.4-96.0). In the test set, the probabilistic algorithm again had higher sensitivity and PPV. For deliveries in 2001-2008 with no "gold standard" linkage, the probabilistic algorithm found matched infants for 58.3% and the deterministic algorithm, 52.8%. On medical record review, 100% of linked pairs appeared valid. CONCLUSIONS: A probabilistic algorithm improved linkage proportion and accuracy compared to a deterministic algorithm. Better linkage methods can increase the value of EHRs for pregnancy outcomes research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Data Linkage: A powerful research tool with potential problems 2008Record linkage software in the public domain: a comparison of Link Plus, The Link King, and a `basic' deterministic algorithm 1991Record Linkage Strategies 1997Data linkage methods used in maternally‐linked birth and infant death surveillance data sets from the United States (Georgia, Missouri, Utah and Washington State), Israel, Norway, Scotland and Western Australia 2012Investigating linkage rates among probabilistically linked birth and hospitalization records 2011Evaluation of record linkage between a large healthcare provider and the Utah Population Database 2009Acurácia em métodos de relacionamento probabilístico de bases de dados em saúde: revisão sistemática 2013Creation and evaluation of a multi-layered maternal and child health database for comparative effectiveness research.

Cited by

2017Probabilistic linkage to enhance deterministic algorithms and reduce data linkage errors in hospital administrative data

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.