The Counsel of Rogues?: A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer's Role

Tim Dare

68 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal Education and Practice Innovations Legal Rights and Human Rights Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

Abstract

Contents: The standard conception of the lawyer's role The critique of the standard conception The idea of role-obligation The standard conception and the role of law The standard conception and the client-professional relationship Virtue ethics, legal ethics, and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird Detachment, distance and integrity Conclusion: a response to the critique Bibliography Index.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2021Target Centred Virtue Ethics 2011Lawyers and the Public Good: Democracy in Action?2013The “quiet revolution” in criminal defence: how the zealous advocate slipped into the shadow 2015What is professional integrity?2010IF PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS IS THE ANSWER, WHAT IS THE QUESTION?2014Accountability and the Regulation of the Large Law Firm Lawyer

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.