Personality disorders in leaders

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to assess highly toxic leaders and dysfunctional organizations as presented via management consulting and executive coaching assignments. Design/methodology/approach The paper employs an action research approach via two participant observer case studies incorporating theDSM IV‐TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Findings The paper finds that the nexus of dysfunctional organizational systems may be located in “pre‐existing” leadership pathologies. Research limitations/implications First, additional research will be needed to confirm and extend the findings of individual pathologies in leaders to dysfunctional organizational systems; second, a closer look is necessary at the applicability of theDSM IV‐TRto pathologies at the organizational level; third, due to the action research, case study approach utilized, there is somewhat limited generalizability; fourth, there are limitations re: the applicability ofDSM IV‐TRas an assessment tool for management researchers due to the necessity of training in clinical psychology. Practical implications The importance of distinguishing personality disorders in leaders from toxic behaviors falling within a range of “normal pathology,” and the ability to assess individual leadership pathology within organizational systems via the clinically trained usage of theDSM IV‐TR; providing clinical assessment tools for reducing the number of misdiagnoses of leadership pathology in the workplace; encouraging collaboration between management and psychology researchers and practitioners. Originality/value This paper fills a gap in the toxic organizations research by identifying personality disorders in leaders and providing an action research agenda for incorporating theDSM IV‐TRas a means of extending the repertoire of assessment tools;

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.