The art of oblivion

Abstract

This article enquires into the cultural uses of memory and forgetting in seventeenth-century England, focusing on strategic acts of recall and oblivion accompanying the restoration of the Stuart monarchy in 1660. In a reading of three representative texts from the 1660s – Samuel Tuke's The Adventures of Five Hours, John Dryden's ‘Astraea Redux’, and John Milton's Paradise Lost – it examines the relationship between officially sanctioned fictions of state and dissenting literary-political counter-fictions. The analysis of calculated acts of oblivion, memory, and countermemory is intended to contribute to a more complex picture of the social, political, and literary interconnections after 1660. In this light, the Restoration appears not as a monolithic reaction against the so-called Interregnum, but as a series of cultural reorientations characterised by the urgency of finding acceptable representations of history and memory amidst competing rhetorics of cultural and religious identity.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.