No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No AccessPolicy Research Working Papers21 Jun 2013Corporate Growth, Financing, and Risks in the Decade before East Asia's Financial CrisisAuthors/Editors: Larry Lang, Stijn Claessens, Simeon DjankovLarry Lang, Stijn Claessens, Simeon Djankovhttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2017SectionsAboutPDF (0.1 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract:November 1998 Empirical analysis shows that some of the vulnerabilities in corporate financial structures that helped trigger East Asia's financial crisis already existed in the early 1990s. East Asia's financial crisis has been attributed in part to the weak performance and risky financial structures of Asian corporations. In the period before Asia's financial crisis, however, analysts were not suggesting that the financial structures of many East Asian corporations would be unable to withstand the combined shocks of increased interest rates, depreciated currencies, and large drops in domestic demand. To document the basic record of corporate performance and financing structures for East Asian corporations, Claessens, Djankov, and Lang analyze data for 5,550 firms in nine countries for the period 1988-96. They find large differences in performance and financial structure across countries. Profitability-as measured by real return on assets (ROA) in local currency-was relatively low in Hong Kong, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Singapore in the decade before the crisis. Corporations in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand averaged high returns-roughly double those in Germany and the United States for the same period. In 1994-96, measured performance declined somewhat in several East Asian countries, especially Japan and Korea. Those differences in performance were not fully reflected in sales growth, as investment rates were high and continued to drive output growth in all countries. These stylized facts suggest that the East Asian miracle was indeed based on a vibrant corporate sector. But the combination of high investment and relatively low profitability in some countries meant that much external financing was needed. Outside equity was used sparingly-in part because stock markets were depressed (Japan) or because insiders preferred to retain control-so borrowing was heavy in most East Asian countries, and leverage increased in the years before 1996 in Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. Risk increased as short-term (foreign exchange) borrowing became increasingly important in the 1990s, especially in Malaysia, Taiwan (China), and Thailand. In other words, it is now apparent that some of the vulnerabilities in corporate financial structures that were to become an important factor in East Asia's financial crisis already existed in the early 1990s, although they were not noted at the time. This paper-a product of the Economic Policy Unit, Finance, Private Sector, and Infrastructure Network-is part of a larger effort in the network to study the performance and financing structures of East Asian corporations. Previous bookNext book FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetailsCited byCORPORATE FINANCING BEHAVIOUR AND VULNERABILITY IN INDONESIACorporate Ownership and Control, Vol.5, No.21 January 2008 View Published: November 1999 Copyright & Permissions Related RegionsEast Asia & PacificRelated CountriesIndonesiaJapanKorea, Republic ofSingaporeThailandRelated TopicsFinance and Financial Sector DevelopmentMacroeconomics and Economic GrowthPrivate Sector Development KeywordsBALANCE SHEETCURRENCIESEQUITYFINANCIAL CRISISFINANCIAL STRUCTURESFOREIGN EXCHANGEFUTUREINTERESTINTEREST RATESINVESTMENTINVESTMENT RATESLOCAL CURRENCYMARKETRETURNRETURN ON ASSETSRETURNSSHORT-TERM BORROWINGSTOCKSTOCK EXCHANGESSTOCK MARKETS PDF DownloadLoading ...
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.