SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A new era in sports science: the launch of BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
6 references·0 citing·21 second hop
A new era in sports science: the launch of BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation (2013)A new era in sports science: the launch o…Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review:…Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes (2010)Is open peer review the faire…Is open peer review the fairest system? No (2010)Is open peer review the faire…A SMARTTfuture for sports medicine (2008)A SMARTTfuture for sports med…Making Reviewers Visible (2002)Making Reviewers VisibleEffect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial (2010)Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science (2012)Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? (2017)Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ (2020)Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2008)Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science (2009)Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities (2013)Evidence-Based Management and the Trustworthiness of Our Cumulative Scientific Knowledge: Implications for Teaching, Research, and Practice (2014)Guidelines for open peer review implementation (2019)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior (2016)Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals (2008)We Have to Break Up (2009)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 2002Making Reviewers Visible167 cited
  • 2012Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation105 cited
  • 2010Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes80 cited
  • 2010Is open peer review the fairest system? No77 cited
  • 2008A SMARTTfuture for sports medicine49 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work