SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CONSORT in China: past development and future direction
16 references·2 citing·36 second hop
CONSORT in China: past development and future direction (2015)CONSORT in China: past development and fu…Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery (2010)Standards for reporting rando…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals (2008)Chinese authors do need CONSO…An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China (2008)An assessment of the quality …The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China (2007)The Quality of Reporting of R…Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)Standards of Reporting of Ran…Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement (2006)Reporting in randomized clini…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT Statement (1996)The CONSORT StatementImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Quality of reporting and risk of bias: a review of randomised trials in occupational health (2021)Quality of reporting and risk…Endorsement of the Consort Statement by Chinese Journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of Journal Editors and Review of Journals— Instructions for Authors (2016)Endorsement of the Consort St…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias (2004)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 2006Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement227 cited
  • 2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
  • 2007The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China140 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China
75 cited
  • 2008Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals66 cited
  • 2010Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery65 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Endorsement of the Consort Statement by Chinese Journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of Journal Editors and Review of Journals— Instructions for Authors16 cited
    • 2021Quality of reporting and risk of bias: a review of randomised trials in occupational health14 cited