Articlebronze2006

Official marital status, cohabiting, and self-rated health—time trends in Finland, 1978–2001

Kaisla Joutsenniemi · Tuija P Martelin · Seppo V. P. Koskinen · Pekka Martikainen · Tommi Härkänen · Riitta M. Luoto +1 more

54 citations0/0 files storedEuropean Journal of Public Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Family Dynamics and Relationships Marriage and Family Dynamics Health disparities and outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Married persons are healthier and live longer than single, divorced, and widowed persons. Time trends in self-rated health (SRH) by marital status and cohabitation have remained largely unstudied. We aim to assess the levels and trends of SRH by official marital status and cohabitation, and to study the causes of these differences. METHODS: Two nationally representative cross-sectional surveys were conducted 20 years apart in Finland. Data on self-reported marital status, SRH, education, smoking, and long-standing illness were collected from Finns aged 30-64 years in 1978-80 (Mini-Finland Health Survey, N = 6102, response rate 96%) and 2000-01 (Health 2000 Survey, N = 5871, response rate 92%). RESULTS: SRH has improved in the last 20 years, but differences between marital status groups have not reduced. In 2000-01, non-married persons reported worse SRH than married persons. Among men, single [cumulative odds ratio (COR) = 1.55; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.22-1.99] and divorced (COR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.17-2.05) persons showed the poorest SRH, while among women widows (1.53; 95% CI 1.04-2.26) were the most disadvantaged group. The SRH of cohabiting persons did not significantly differ from that of married persons. Differences in educational structure, smoking, and the prevalence of long-term illness explain part of the marital status differences in SRH among men, but less so among women. Among both single men and women as well as among widowed women, SRH had improved slightly less than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: The challenges on public health posed by growing numbers of currently not married people are likely to increase.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 54 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Mortality Differentials by Marital Status: An International Comparison 2000Survival, Functional Limitations, and Self-rated Health in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1992 2002Health in Household Context: Living Arrangements and Health in Late Middle Age 1996Mortality after the death of a spouse: rates and causes of death in a large Finnish cohort.1992Marriage and Psychological Well-Being: Some Evidence on Selection into Marriage 2003The effects of widowhood on physical and mental health, health behaviors, and health outcomes: The Women's Health Initiative.1992Competing explanations for associations between marital status and health 1994Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men?

Cited by

2009Development of a New Resilience Scale: The Resilience in Midlife Scale (RIM Scale)2008Suicide and Marital Status in Italy 2008Self-rated general health among 40-year-old Danes and its association with all-cause mortality at 10-, 20-, and 29 years' follow-up 2014Does Marriage Really Matter to Health? Intra- and Inter-Country Evidence from China, Japan, Taiwan, and the Republic of Korea

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.