Union/Nonunion Differentials: Membership or Coverage?

Ethel B. Jones

31 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Human Resources

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Labor Movements and Unions Labor market dynamics and wage inequality Legal and Labor Studies

Abstract

Economists have long suggested that labor unions suffer a free rider problem. The argument is that, since union-set wages are available to all workers covered by unions irrespective of their union status, and union membership entails costs, workers will ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

n.d.Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital 1965Unionism and Relative Wages in the United States.1979New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States 1972Racial Discrimination and Trade Unionism 1955Economics of Labor Relations.

Cited by

1986Chapter 20 Union relative wage effects 2000The Union Membership Wage Premium for Employees Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements 2004Reconsidering union wage effects: Surveying new evidence on an old topic 1993RIGHT‐TO‐WORK LAWS AND FREE RIDING 1993Collective Bargaining Coverage of Union Members and Nonmembers in the Public Sector 2004Free-riding in New Zealand: Incidence, Motives and Policy Implications 2008Free-Riding in Australia 1987The effect of type of union on member-nonmember wage differentials

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.