Deterrence versus Judicial Error: A Comparative View of Standards of Proof

Thomas Gaube

26 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Abstract

»Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1986The judgment proof problem 1987Efficient Awards and Standards of Proof in Judicial Proceedings 1989Legal Error, Litigation, and the Incentive to Obey the Law 2002A Comparative View of Standards of Proof

Cited by

2012Judicial Errors and Crime Deterrence: Theory and Experimental Evidence 2012HACIA UN ESTÁNDAR DE PRUEBA CIVIL

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.