Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature

16 references·14 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables757 cited
1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
1989Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis338 cited
2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

256 cited

2000Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies148 cited

2000How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?126 cited

2001Systematic Reviews of Evaluations of Prognostic Variables120 cited

Cited by

2008A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields46 cited
2013Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 201043 cited
2007What is the quality of reporting in weight loss intervention studies? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials40 cited
2007A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.39 cited
2009Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in burns care. A systematic review39 cited
2010Reporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic review37 cited
2011Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry35 cited
2015The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study30 cited
2011Reliability of 3 Assessment Tools Used to Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials for Treatment of Neck Pain25 cited
2015Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.021 cited
2015Explanation and Elaboration of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders Checklist: A Guideline for the Reporting of Incidence and Prevalence Studies in Neuroepidemiology17 cited
2021A multivariate model for successful publication of intensive care medicine randomized controlled trials in the highest impact factor journals: the SCOTI score14 cited
2006Caracterización de las áreas de sistema respiratorio en España14 cited
2015Volume and methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery: assessment over a 10-year period14 cited