Climate Change and the Problem of Representation

Abstract

How do we know climate change?How do we encounter its reality?This question brings to mind a history of scepticism and denial-those who ask 'where is the evidence?' against scientific efforts to model and map out predicted temperature rises.Yet the word prediction is telling here: how can you know something that is still unfolding?In order to respond to the manifesting consequences of environmental change, there is an imperative to capture and convey change in the midst of process.Somewhere between scepticism and prediction is the problem of representation-a concern that unites scientists and artists in the desire to say something of truth about the world.Signs of change obsess us and we look to science for orientation through these.Poetic representation is valued as a tool of communication and inspiration-to educate, warn and motivate responses.Yet as the consequences of climate change continue to manifest, representation sits ambiguously in a context of these materially-grounded concerns.This paper offers a rethinking of the role of representation in environmental discourse.It suggests that rather than representation's inability to access the real, the more pressing issue is the relationship between humans and the non-human environment that modes of representation assert.It is ultimately our ontological and epistemological traditions, and the work of representation within these, that determine our distance from or proximity to the elements of a transforming ecology.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.