Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Neuroimage Evidence and the Insanity Defense

6 references·13 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1981When people ask "why" questions, and the heuristics of attributional search.1,108 cited
2008Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study550 cited
2008The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses132 cited
2008Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance125 cited
2011Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: No impact.122 cited
2007Are Neuroimages Like Photographs of the Brain?101 cited

Cited by

2013Look Again: Effects of Brain Images and Mind–Brain Dualism on Lay Evaluations of Research75 cited
2014The Impact of Neuroimages in the Sentencing Phase of Capital Trials68 cited
2013Fooled by the brain: Re-examining the influence of neuroimages51 cited
2019Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review47 cited
2013Neuroimages in court: less biasing than feared41 cited
2015Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias23 cited
2023Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seductive allure of neuroscience22 cited
2013Visual Attention and the Neuroimage Bias19 cited
2017The role of neurological and psychological explanations in legal judgments of psychopathic wrongdoers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited

2018Neuroscience and Jury Decision-Making16 cited

2018Neuroscientific, Neuropsychological, and Psychological Evidence Comparably Impact Legal Decision Making: Implications for Experts and Legal Practitioners11 cited

2018Undergraduates' Perceptions Towards Psychology As A Science: Differentiating Explicit Responses From Implicit Associations0 cited

2016Opposing Experts, Relative Judgments and the Reemergence of the Neuroimage Bias0 cited