Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences

Elizabeth Aries

202 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies Gender and Feminist Studies Gender Studies in Language

Abstract

This is critical review and re-evaluation of the empirical literature on men and women in conversational interaction in light of recent debates about gender differences. Aries contends that gender differences have been exaggerated and that many variables have been ignored, most notably the status and power of the individuals in conversation, their race, their education, among other factors.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 202 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006Expectation States Theory 2004A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech.2015Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility.2003Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarily in mixed-sex interactions.2011Women Are More Likely Than Men to Use Tentative Language, Aren’t They? A Meta-Analysis Testing for Gender Differences and Moderators 2012Communication in multiplayer gaming: Examining player responses to gender cues 2003The New economic sociology: developments in an emerging field 1998Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.